Also follow Fr. Paul at his personal website - mtmonk.com

Copyright © 2011-2018 William Paul McKane. All rights reserved.

26 March 2011

Schedule For Week Beginning 3/26/11

For those who want to speak with me before or after Mass, this is my schedule for the week beginning 3/26/11:

Sat. 3/26:
3:00pm - Wedding at St. Luke's
4:30-5:00pm - Confessions at St. Luke's
5:30pm - Mass at St. Luke's

Sun. 3/27:
9:00am - Mass as Most Blessed Sacrament
11:00am - Mass at St. Joseph's

Tues. 3/29:
5:30pm - Mass at St. Luke's
7:00pm - Reconciliation service at St. Luke's

Wed. 3/30:
11:00-11:20am - Confessions at Most Blessed Sacrament
11:30am - Mass at Most Blessed Sacrament followed by Our Lady of Perpetual Help devotion

Thurs. 3/31:
9:00am - Mass at St. Luke's
6:30pm - Faith class at Most Blessed Sacrament

Fri. 4/01:
11:00-11:20am - Confessions at Most Blessed Sacrament
11:30am - Mass at Most Blessed Sacrament

23 March 2011

"The Bible Says..."

23 March 2011

Dear Friends,

In light of our efforts to live as disciples of Christ, I have a few comments to make in response to further reading in Rick Warren’s popular book, The Purpose-Driven Life.

I can understand the author’s use of popular language and terms to reach a wider audience, but I often find myself asking, “Does Warren believe what he is writing, or is he just saying this for an effect?”  In particular, he keeps writing, “The Bible says...,” as if the Bible were a particular person or even God, and could communicate directly to people.  If he wrote, “The author of Genesis tells us,” or similar words, I would be less perplexed.  But the very frequent use of “The Bible says” seems to come out of a fundamentalist environment, and appeals to biblical fundamentalists, who teach the sacred texts as a single work.  Rick Warren draws from poetry, story, law, as if it can all be interpreted in the same way:  “The Bible says, and that is that!”  In other words, there is no attempt to question the meaning or validity or time-relevance of particular quotations; all of “the Bible” is treated as just true, and that is that.  When Rick Warren mentioned Noah built an ark, and had in sitting “in his front yard,” I really wondered if he is not in some ways playing with his readers.  

More to the point, as an example of biblical fundamentalism that ought to be disturbing to a human being who knows that we are obliged to think and to question, Warren discusses obedience as part of divine worship.  On that, nearly any Christian would agree.  But then he slips in a very clever appeal for money which really startled me by its audacity:  To attend church without “tithing” is an act of disobedience to God (p. 76).  He lifts the Hebrew practice of “tithing” out of its original context, and assumes that Christians must “tithe.”  Well, the same Jewish context insists on worshiping God on the Sabbath, which is Friday sundown to Saturday sundown; and the same context insists on keeping all the kosher laws.  But Warren says nothing of these things, which are part of the same original setting in Jewish worship.  

Insistence on “tithing” (giving a tenth of one’s wealth to the religious authorities, presumably) reinforces my conception of a televangelist:  a Bible in one hand, a rake (for money) in the other hand.  I wonder, “How dare a minister of the gospel lay on people a claim that if they are not giving the church 10% of their wealth or earnings, that they are openly disobeying God?”  It is no wonder some of these “Bible-centered” churches become so large and prosperous, if they can draw on 10% of each person’s net income,  or real wealth.  Again, understand that Rick Warren is lifting out of its context in ancient religious practice one particular custom (tithing), and omitting the many other practices that apparently would not be so lucrative for his church (Sabbath worship, reading Torah in Hebrew, bar-mitvah for all boys, keeping strict kosher laws, and so on.)  

To be honest, I find the kind of fundamentalistic reading of sacred texts, in this case, “the Bible,” that Warren practices to be nearly blasphemous.  He can twist the text to say what he wants it to say, and often does so by using some twelve different translations, some of which are very lose and strange paraphrases far divorced from the original meaning.  He picks and chooses passages to cite as if they are “the truth,” and does not  acknowledge that he is omitting many passages which say things contrary to what he wants his readers to learn.

Where are the human beings who remember that as human beings we must engage in  genuine inquiry, in an open search for truth, in the simple act of questioning, and not just fall back on, “the Bible says?”  Is it not a real shame if one seeks to be “a good Christian” and forgets that he or she must be a good human being, and seek truth wherever it can be found?  We have a duty to think, to question, and not to fall back on easy, simplistic answers, such as, “the Bible says.”  That approach to life is insufficient and misleading.  But Rick Warren illustrates that fundamentalism can be very lucrative.

In the wise words of Socrates, “The unexamined life is not worthy of a human being.”

Respectfully yours, 
Fr. Wm. Paul McKane

21 March 2011

A First Response to Rick Warren's "Purpose-Driven Life"

21 March 2011

Dear Family and Friends,

21 March:  Spring, the Feast of St. Benedict, the birthday of Johann Sebastian Bach (1685-1750).  For me, three great reasons to celebrate today.  Because I have some hours off today, I shall take the pups to Pelican Point, about 35 miles upstream on the Missouri.  It is a beautiful locale, as the Missouri flows out of the Helena to Great Falls Canyon (often miscalled "Wolf Creek Canyon" here), and breaks onto the high plains with mountain outcroppings characteristic of north central Montana.  But one problem:  Men can set traps for beaver and other small animals along the banks, and such a trap could seriously wound or kill one of my dogs, so I must be highly vigilant (especially of Moses, who likes to sniff out the border area between river and river bank, because small animals live there).  Without a destructive event, an hour to an hour and a half, walking about and photographing at Pelican Point, as the dogs run and swim with delight, should be a good break for me.

At the request of a parishioner who is both Catholic and an evangelical Protestant (she reminds me of Sister Sharon in "Elmer Gantry"), I am reading a book by a well-known evangelical minister in California named Rick Warren.  Apparently the book sold millions upon millions of copies a few years back.  It is called "The Purpose-Driven Life."  It is the first time I have read a book by an evangelical Christian in perhaps thirty-five years or so.  In my opinion, it has some real strengths (so I can see why it sold so many copies) but some disturbing weaknesses.  I keep wondering:  "Does Rick Warren believe this, or is he just trying to write on a popular level for broader appeal?"  He seems utterly unaware of decisive parts of the philosophical-theological tradition going back to the philosophers of ancient Greece, to Moses, to the leading Christian philosophical theologians and mystics throughout the ages.  His repeated claims, "The Bible says," keeps reminding me of the child's game, "Simon says."  Does he know that in many cases he is reading into ancient texts his own beliefs?  Or, does he do that for mass appeal?  I truly do not know.  And how can one write in a chosen field without immersing oneself in the leading works in that field?  (Thomas Aquinas is the last word on nothing, as he himself acknowledges, but anyone dabbling in theology and ignoring Thomas (or Plato, for that matter) is either displaying ignorance or willful neglect, perhaps as a physicist would be doing if fully ignorant of Newton and Einstein.)

Just for the record, I am no more at peace with much Catholic literature, that grounds arguments on the claim, "The Church says...."  Thomas Aquinas put it well some 800 years ago:  An appeal to authority is the weakest argument.  Thomas himself will site passages from the Hebrew and Christian scriptures, and from writings by Greek, Jewish, Christian, Muslim authors over the centuries, but never does so to prove a point, or to disprove someone else.  He reasons with the reader, and holds up the reasoning process as a necessary and proper human activity of the mind.  That I can understand.  A sacred text or another author may point the mind in a certain direction, but one must see it for oneself, test whether or not the particular claim, opinion, insight, "revelation" is true or not.  Surely this is the approach that I have learned from so many of the best minds from Parmenides and Plato to Anselm, Aquinas, Voegelin.  Or Jesus himself, who was both a master story teller, and a master questioner (as in "Why are you afraid?  Have you no faith?"), and never fell back on mere tradition or unquestioned assumptions.

I am wondering if there is any need for presenting to more everyday readers a more rational, open approach to things of the spirit without grounding arguments on sacred texts, church documents, mere belief, but trying to reason with the reader every step of the way.  As Rick Warren writes from an evangelical Christian perspective and clearly appeals to some evangelicals, is there a place to draw on insights from many and diverse spiritual traditions--wherever truth can be found--to encourage a far less sectarian, less confined or "religious" approach to reality?  In one form or another, this is the question I keep asking myself as I read Warren's book.

A few years back Vic ("Dr. Camp") had some clashes with a group of evangelical Christians insisting on a literal conception of the Genesis creation story, and using that to critique experimental science, as I recall. That problem is part of the same larger issue:  How to move towards truth and practical insights with as open a mind as one can form.  As I see it, ideologies or dogmas of all types restrict inquiry, and therefore hinder living in what I would call "spiritual freedom," or "intellectual freedom," if one prefers.

As for me, I will never be at home in a rigid, doctrinal system of any form.  How can we help human beings in our culture move past blinders into the open light of free inquiry?  How does one help others really "live by the Spirit," and not be bound by "the spirit of the age?"  How does one speak to men and women who have more kinship with Nietzsche, perhaps, than with any sacred text?  (By the way, I still love to read Nietzsche, whose fierce questioning and atheism test one's cherished beliefs.)  How does one help people who are weary of "God-talk" live in openness to truth and goodness, which would seem to be the ultimate purpose of the leading spiritual and religious traditions?

Just a few thoughts to share for the present.  More shall follow.

Assignment for March 24, 2011

We continue to meet at Most Blessed Sacrament, beginning at 6:30pm, for a 15 minute scripture meditation, followed by a 1 hour discussion of the upcoming Sunday readings.

This week we will be discussing the readings for Sunday, March 27:

Reading 1 - Ex 17:3-7
Reading 2 - Rom 5:1-2, 5-8
Gospel - Jn 4:5-42 or 4:5-15, 19b-26, 39a, 40-42

An additional assignment for this week: Reflect upon the life of a saint, who has influenced you.

13 March 2011

Assignment for March 17, 2011

We continue to meet at Most Blessed Sacrament on Thursdays from 6:30-8:00pm. Class begins with a 15 minute scripture meditation in the chapel followed by a discussion period downstairs.

We'll be discussing the Sunday readings for March 20. Please bring a bible to class.

Reading 1 - Gn 12:1-4a
Reading 2 - 2 Tm 1:8b-10
Gospel - Mt 17:1-9

02 March 2011

New Class Time and Place

During Lent we will meet Thursday evenings at Most Blessed Sacrament. Beginning at 6:30pm, there will be a 20 minute scripture mediation in the chapel followed by class downstairs in the dining hall. For handicap accessibility, the elevator is located in the annex on the east side of the church.  
The discussion for Thursday, March 10 will be the Sunday readings for March 13:

Reading 1: Gn 2:7-9; 3:1-7
Gospel:  Mt 4:1-11